Major Wall Street banks are reportedly pushing the Federal Reserve to formally lock in recent supervisory reforms to prevent future Democratic administrations from reversing them.
Banks are pushing for the Fed to resolve legal uncertainties around the softer process that has replaced “matters requiring attention” (MRAs). MRAs were previously used as a primary tool by bank examiners to enforce lenders to address risk management and control weaknesses, reported Reuters on Tuesday. This development follows the most substantial revamp of bank oversight since the 2008 financial crisis, initiated by regulators under President Donald Trump‘s administration.
Banks are looking to safeguard their gains, foreseeing that Democrats, who are often skeptical of Wall Street, may try to reverse these changes. The Fed is reportedly planning to provide more clarity on this matter.
Michelle Bowman, Trump’s Fed Vice Chair for Supervision, who is leading these changes, has been criticized for attempting to change the Fed’s supervisory culture and tilt the power balance towards bank management. However, she has defended her stance, asserting that she aims to concentrate supervisors on actual risks, not to dilute oversight.
According to the report, banks are advocating for clear written assurances from the Fed that supervisors will not upgrade observations to MRAs unless the facts surrounding the issue change. The Fed has signaled that it will revise public 2013 documentation around observations, which could offer more transparency.
The Federal Reserve did not immediately respond to Benzinga‘s request for comments.
Warsh Signals Major Fed Shift
This move by Wall Street banks comes as Trump’s pick, Kevin Warsh, took the oath as the new Federal Reserve Chair on Friday. Trump told everyone during the swearing-in ceremony that he wants Warsh to be “totally independent.”
Renowned economist Mohamed A. El-Erian suggested that this could indicate that the tension between Trump and the outgoing Chair, Jerome Powell, whom the President bashed for being “too late” for rate cuts, was more personal than structural.
Among the many changes that Warsh could bring to the Federal Reserve, one major shift would be replacing the Fed’s long-favored core PCE inflation gauge with trimmed-mean and median PCE measures from the Dallas and Cleveland Feds. Warsh criticized core PCE for mechanically excluding food and energy prices, arguing that his preferred alternatives provide a more accurate view by filtering out only the most extreme price swings. Notably, these alternative gauges currently show inflation much closer to the Fed’s 2% target without any actual change in prices.
Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.
Image via Shutterstock
Recent Comments