AptarGroup (NYSE:ATR) released first-quarter financial results and hosted an earnings call on Friday. Read the complete transcript below.
This transcript is brought to you by Benzinga APIs. For real-time access to our entire catalog, please visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ for a consultation.
Access the full call at https://events.q4inc.com/attendee/354404867
Summary
AptarGroup’s Q1 results were mixed, with reported sales increasing by 11% due to favorable currency movements, but core sales remained flat.
The company anticipates a decline of approximately $65 million in emergency medicine sales for the full year 2026, with a significant impact in the first half.
Strategic initiatives include strong growth in pharma end markets, particularly in injectables and consumer healthcare, and continued innovation in beauty and closures.
Operational challenges included maintenance issues and temporary plant closures due to extreme weather, impacting closures segment margins.
Future guidance for Q2 suggests adjusted earnings per share between $1.32 and $1.40, with an anticipated return to growth in the prescription division outside emergency medicine.
Full Transcript
OPERATOR
Of AptarGroup. Our press release and accompanying slide deck have been posted on our website under the Investor Relations page. During this call we will be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures. These measures are reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and the reconciliations are set forth in the press release. Please refer to the press release disseminated yesterday for the reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to to the most comparable GAAP measure, discussed during this earnings call. As always, we will post a replay of this call on our website. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Stephan thank you
Stephan
Mary, and good morning everyone. We appreciate you joining us on the call today. As previously announced, I will be retiring later this year and we will welcome Gael Touya as Aptar’s next CEO on September 1st. I will still lead the Q2 earnings call on July 31st, so please hold any remarks for that call. Gael and I are collaborating closely during the transition period. Gael is joining us today and would like to say a few words to kick off the call.
Gael Touya
Gael thank you Stefan and good morning everyone. I’m pleased to join the call today and so grateful to the warm welcome I’ve received as CEO-designate. I’m very much looking forward to connecting more closely with our investors and stakeholders over the coming months and happy to be here with you today.
Stephan
Thank you Gael everyone. Again, please save your roast comments until the second quarter and the tougher questions you can keep for the third quarter when Gael officially takes over as CEO. Now I’ll begin my remarks by highlighting our first quarter results and later in the call, our CFO Vanessa Canu will provide additional details on the key drivers for the quarter. Overall, the quarter unfolded largely as we expected. Reported growth benefited from favorable currency movements. However, underlying performance reflected a mixed operating environment driven primarily by the anticipated emergency medicine destocking following exceptional growth in Q1 2024 and Q1 2025. Across the broader portfolio, demand trends remain healthy and several of our core growth platforms have continued to perform well. Our pharma segment continued to see growing demand in key areas including GLP-1, biologics, systemic nasal drug delivery, nasal decongestants and ophthalmic dispensing, reinforcing our confidence in the long term growth profile of the business consumer. Dispensing also contributed positively with volume and mix improvements across both beauty and closures. In beauty, demand was supported by strength in prestige fragrance and select personal care applications. Closures benefited from high product volumes, which was offset by the passing on of lower resin pricing across both segments. Our teams remain focused on disciplined execution, portfolio optimization and overall operational resilience. Before I turn the call over to Anessa, let me turn to our pharma pipeline, where our core business has continued to deliver systemic nasal drug delivery is accelerating and injectables now accounts for a greater portion of our opportunity set. The decline in emergency medicine dispensing systems negatively impacted core sales by 3% in the first quarter. Over the past several months, multiple programs have advanced through key clinical and regulatory milestones, many of them leveraging aptar’s market leading nasal and drug delivery technologies across intranasal delivery. Our platforms are supporting a range of phase 2 programs including ENA-Respiratory virus agnostic Respiratory Therapy. These programs rely on the precision, reliability and scalability of our delivery systems supported by aptar’s integrated formulation and regulatory capabilities, reinforcing our role as a trusted development partner. I also wanted to share a few approval updates regarding Neffy, the emergency treatment of type 1 allergic reactions including anaphylaxis. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration approved an update to prescribing information for Neffy, removing the age criteria. In addition, Health Canada granted approval for Neffy along with the Emirates Drug Establishment in uae. In the prescription market, CIPLA recently announced that that they received U.S. FDA approval for the first AB rated generic therapeutic equivalent of Ventolin using our metered dose inhaler valve. This medication is used to treat or prevent bronchospasms in people who have reversible obstructive airway disease and is another example of our technologies being used on the original drug and then playing a key role in the approval process for the generic version. I also want to highlight a few more products that launched in the quarter. Our elastomeric components for injectables are featured on a blood derivative medication in the US Our ophthalmic dispensing technology is being used for an eye care product in Latin America and in Europe our bag on valve spray technology is featured on a nasal saline for infants. Finally, our recent partnership with Enable Injections integrates Aptar Digital Health connected lifecycle ready digital solutions with the EnFuse On-Body delivery system supporting patient engagement, patient adherence and data insights from clinical development through commercialization. In beauty, one of our newest prestige fragrance pumps is featured on Dior Addict by Christian Dior. Also, as brands move toward more alcohol free water based formulas, they need pumps specifically engineered to dispense higher viscosity or BI phase liquids while delivering the fine mist consumers expect from a perfume. There’s also a growing trend for skincare infused fragrances, those that hydrate, soothe or even protect along with microencapsulated fragrances where molecules are suspended in the formula to offer controlled fragrance release. Several of our pumps are engineered to address these growing consumer demands and the associated dispensing challenges including our spray technology for the European launch of Galen’s Aqua Allegoria Alcohol free hybrid and microencapsulated line in skincare and makeup. Following the success of Clarins Double Serum, Clarins has launched Double Serum foundation for featuring our patented dual dispensing technology with progressive dosage. Lastly, Clorox is using our custom actuator on its Daily Air spray in North America, highlighting the value of early customer engagement where rapid prototyping and application specific engineering can accelerate product launches. Turning to Closures Our dispensing closure that’s often used for Asian sauces is now featured on Newman’s Own Barbecue Sauces. Lastly, I want to highlight our technology that’s turning beauty and personal care products upside down, similar to what we did with ketchup and other condiments. We’ve launched our inverted lidless closures for single handed dispensing that can be used with shampoos and conditioners, body washes, baby soaps, lotions, pet shampoos and more. This technology is already being featured on a pet care shampoo line and additional versions have been successful in the home care and hair care markets. It features our patented SimplySqueeze flow control valve and reflects our commitment to converting categories and making daily routines easier for consumers around the world. I also want to provide a brief update on our ongoing litigation with ARS Pharmaceuticals. The case continues to progress and we are pleased that the court denied Ars Motion to Dismiss. We are now well into the discovery phase and we have also filed a motion to dismiss the Southern District antitrust case or alternatively to have it transferred to New York where the underlying trade secret case is pending. As these matters remain ongoing, there is nothing further that I can share at this time. Now I would like to turn the call over to Vanessa to share more details on the quarterly results.
Vanessa Canu (Chief Financial Officer)
Vanessa thank you Stefan and good morning everyone. Let me begin by summarizing the highlights for the quarter. Our reported sales increased 11% and core sales, which adjust for currency effects and acquisitions, were flat compared to the prior year. We achieved adjusted EBITDA of $189 million, an increase of 3% from the prior year and adjusted EBITDA margin of 19.2% compared to 20.7% in the prior year primarily due to less favorable product mix and operational challenges. In beauty enclosures. Adjusted earnings per share were $1.19 compared to the prior year’s adjusted earnings per share of $1.30 at comparable exchange rates. With those high level comments, let’s take a closer look at segment performance. Our pharma Segment’s core sales decreased 1% primarily due to less favorable product mix going into the year. We expected challenging year over year comparisons due to an anticipated decline in emergency medicine. On that note, our previously communicated estimate that emergency medicine sales would Decline by approximately $65 million in full year 2026 continues to track. In Q1, the decline in emergency medicine dispensing systems negatively impacted Pharma core sales by 3%. Let me break that down by market. Starting with our proprietary drug delivery systems, prescription core sales decreased 10%. The decline in emergency medicine dispensing systems negatively impacted prescription core sales by 5%. Additionally, as previously noted by Stefan, Q1, 2025 was a strong quarter for this division across a number of application fields which created a challenging comparison. Looking ahead, we expect continued growth in key end markets as we progress through the year. Consumer healthcare core sales increased 4% primarily due to an increase in sales for eye care and nasal decongestant products. Injectables Core sales increased 20% with strong demand primarily for elastomeric components used for GLP-1. Biologics and antithrombotics services also contributed positively in the quarter and we continue to see strong pipeline build for Annex I and biologics projects and for active material science solutions. Core sales decreased 1% in the quarter. Growth in oral solid dose sales was not sufficient to fully offset lower sales and in probiotics and diabetes test strips. Pharma’s adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter was 33.3%. 150 basis point decline from the prior year. The margin decline was anticipated and driven by product mix and volume due primarily to a decline in high margin emergency medicine sales while royalties continue to positively impact margins. Moving to our beauty segment, core sales increased 3% with improving volumes in the quarter. Looking at the two largest end markets for beauty fragrance, facial skincare and color cosmetics, core sales increased 3% primarily due to double digit sales growth for prestige fragrance pumps as well as color cosmetics. Sales from mass-market prestige fragrance technologies also grew in the quarter offsetting a decline in skin care. Personal care core sales increased 6% with broad based growth across all regions. Applications for both body care and hair care continue to show strong demand. Beauty’s Adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter was 11.1%, a decline of 100 basis points primarily due to less favorable product mix in North America and we are still feeling the impact from the fire at a supplier that we reported last quarter, although we did see the margins improve sequentially from Q4 2025. Moving to the closures segment core sales were flat compared to the prior year while volumes were up. Core sales were impacted by the pass through of lower resin pricing. Looking at the two largest end markets for closures, food core sales decreased 3% primarily due to the resin impacts I just mentioned, partially offset by continued demand for our sauces and condiment dispensing closures. Beverage core sales increased 10%, primarily driven by increased sales for dairy drinks and liquid coffee creamers. This segment’s adjusted EBITDA margin was 13.1%, a 270 basis point decline over the prior year, primarily due to previously reported maintenance issues which our closures team continues to work through and temporary plant closures as a result of extreme weather conditions in North America during the quarter. Additionally, we wrote off a minority investment in the quarter at the total company level. Consolidated gross margins declined by 210 basis points in Q1 year over year primarily as a result of the aforementioned factors. Selling, research and development and administrative costs which we abbreviate as SG&A increased in absolute dollars largely due to currency effects and the impact of acquisitions. Excluding currency effects and acquisitions, SG&A dollars were flat year over year. SG&A as a percentage of sales decreased from 17.5% in Q1 2025 to 17.1%, a 40 basis point reduction year over year. These amounts include approximately $4 million in legal expenses for non ordinary course litigation which did not exist in the prior year period. Adjusted earnings per share of $1.19 were down 8% year over year at comparable exchange rates due to higher depreciation and amortization expenses associated with our capital investments and acquisitions and interest expense of 17 million, a 6 million increase from the prior year due to higher rates on current year borrowings. Our adjusted effective tax rate for the quarter was 22.6% compared to the prior year’s 25.8% due to a more favorable mix of earnings and greater excess tax benefits from share based compensation. Moving over to cash flow, free cash flow more than doubled year over year to $53 million for the quarter comprising of cash from operations of 119 million, net of capital expenditures of 65 million, we repurchased $100 million worth of shares in the quarter and paid $31 million in dividends, returning a total of $131 million of capital to shareholders. Finally, we ended the quarter with a strong balance sheet once again reflecting a cash balance of $223 million as of March 31st, net debt of $1.1 billion and a leverage ratio of 1.43. Before we move to Outlook, I’d like to touch briefly on the impact of the Middle east conflict for Q1. The impact on our results was minimal. As we look ahead to Q2 along with others, we are seeing significantly increased input costs, most notably raw materials, transportation and energy. We are largely passing these higher costs through to customers supported in some cases by index contract clauses for resin. While we have not experienced any material supply chain disruptions to date, we are monitoring the situation very closely. As a reminder, as costs are passed through, margin percentage will experience some compression. Our focus is on neutralizing the impact to our overall earnings. Now onto outlook for Q2. We anticipate second quarter adjusted earnings per share to be in the range of $1.32 to $1.40 per share and an effective tax rate range of 22.5% to 24.5% and a euro to US dollar exchange rate of 1.18 for full year 2026. Capital investments are expected to be in the range of $260 million to $280 million and depreciation and amortization expense is now expected to be between 310 and $320 million. With that, I will turn it over to Stefan to provide a few closing comments before we move to Q and A.
Stephan
Thanks Vanessa. Regarding our outlook, looking ahead to Q2 and excluding the impact of of destocking in emergency medicine within pharma, we anticipate a solid quarter with growth across each of our segments. As a reminder, the first half of the year is challenged due to the emergency medicine comparison which should ease in the second half. Within pharma Outside of the emergency medicine end market, we expect our prescription division to return to healthy growth. We also anticipate continued growth across a number of pharma end markets driven primarily by strength in our injectables and consumer healthcare businesses. Beyond pharma, we are expecting a strong quarter enclosures supported by solid demand and continued growth in beauty with particular strengths in fragrance. As we head into the quarter, we remain mindful of potential supply chain uncertainties and cost volatility as we continue to operate in a dynamic environment. While we are managing these conditions actively, we’re staying disciplined and focused on what we can control as we execute through Q2. The demand we are seeing across a number of end markets is very positive. Our pipeline continues to build in pharma and in beauty and closures. We see a healthy order book activity. And with that, I would like to open the call up for your questions.
OPERATOR
Thank you. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star one on your telephone keypad. If you’d like to withdraw your question, press star one again. In the interest of time and fairness to all participants, please limit yourself to two questions and then come back into the queue. If you have more questions, please stand by while we compile the Q and A list. Your first question comes from Paul Knight at Key Bank. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Paul Knight (Equity Analyst at Key Bank)
Thanks, Stephen. We’ll save the remarks until July as you suggested. The comments you made at the beginning around NEFI being approved for any age group in the U.S. and also in Canada, along with some other highlights. Are those events and approvals enough to say my visibility for 2026 is higher?
OPERATOR
A reminder to unmute yourself everyone. All right, let’s try again. Does this work? Can you hear me now? Operator, can you hear me? Loud and clear. All right. Sorry about that, Paul.
Stephan
We have a new system, so a reminder. No single product really moves the needle substantially. I guess the exception is Narcan in any quarter. And these incremental approvals are more proof points that over time we expect this to be a successful product. Clearly being able to expand the market to children over 30 kilos, I think it is. And additional geographic approvals obviously bode well. But I would not translate that to, you know, significant impact on a quarter or even the balance of the year. And having said that, we feel very good about prescription growth for the balance of the year. Clearly, quarter one had a very tough comparable, but we already in Q2 expect strong growth in prescription, excluding emergency medicine. And then last, are you adding GLP1 capacity in the elastomer business? You know, we made substantial investments and right now we got plenty of capacity. And we do have the ability to creep additional capacity by just putting in additional equipment in the existing large building.
Paul Knight (Equity Analyst at Key Bank)
Good, thank you.
OPERATOR
Your next question comes from the line of Goncham Panjobi, please go ahead. Your line is open.
Ganshan Panjobi
Yeah, hi, good morning. Can you guys hear me okay? Yeah. How you going, gentlemen?
Stephan
Okay. Good morning. Congrats to you, Stefan. First off on a great run. And to you as well, Gael. Our team wishes you the very best in your new role. I guess first off, on the, you know, the RX component I think you said down 5% excluding the naloxone destock if you will. You know, you called out tough comps from a year ago in 1Q25, but the comp for 2Q is also pretty tough from what I remember. I think was up 10% in 1Q 25 and plus 8 in 2Q. What is the expectation for Rx x naloxone in 2Q? Is it, you know, I know you don’t give specific guidance, but do you expect it to grow year over year based on the tough comp as well? Hey, so thanks for the congrats. And the short answer is yes. So yes, the comps are also demanding if you want in Q2, but we expect very solid growth for Rx in Q2 and excluding emergency medicine, of course.
Ganshan Panjobi
Okay, thank you for that. And then consumer, you said plus 4% in 1Q26, but from what I remember last year you had a pretty easy comparison just given the destock that was occurring and in certain whatever it was, cough and cold, etc. So was that in line with your plan in terms of consumer. And then if I could just ask a broader question as it relates to some of the comments about, you know, supply chain uncertainty and was there any benefit in any parts of your businesses across the portfolio as it relates to any sort of pre buy just given customer uncertainty as it relates to supply chain etc. Thank you.
Stephan
Yeah, let me take the second one. And Gael, maybe you can comment on consumer healthcare growth.
Gael Touya
We really don’t see a lot of pre buying and to be perfectly honest, with the bounce back of demand, there’s several product lines that, you know, we couldn’t even fulfill the demand of pre buying. So it’s rather limited. But I understand the question. Consumer healthcare, Gail. Yeah, consumer healthcare. I mean we are back on a positive trend for seven quarters in a row after a good Q4. So it’s in line with expectation. We continue to get a very strong ophthalmic business with a good pipeline conversion. Thermal drugs is doing well and from a cough and cold, I mean we’ve seen the end of the inventory adjustments and we know that in certain countries, I mean that was a low cold and flu season, especially in the US.
OPERATOR
Okay, terrific. Thanks again. Congrats to you again. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of George Staffos at Bank of America securities. Your line is open. Go ahead.
George Staffos (Equity Analyst at Bank of America Securities)
Thanks so much. Hi everyone. Good morning. Congrats to Gael and to Stephane again, we’ll Save the roast for July. Congrats on the quarter two. Point of clarification to Ganshan’s question. I’m sorry, because I’m doing dual calls here. Did you say pharma will grow even
Stephan
with the impact from emergency medicines or just RX will grow X the EMED impact? How should we think about that? Yeah, it’s the latter one. It’s the latter one. So we just wanted to highlight, and I know you all took a lot of comfort that pharma x emergency medicine grew 10% in quarter four and it’s a little bit less this quarter, but we expect again, good growth in quarter two. So don’t read too much into a single quarter here.
George Staffos (Equity Analyst at Bank of America Securities)
Okay. Growth in pharma X EMED. My question is just one on phrma and one on closures. Stephan, Gael, is there any thought in terms of what you’re seeing with GLP1s recognizing it’s not a huge driver of your business that nonetheless maybe there’s some pipeline filling occurring somewhere? How do you, you know, work against or peer into that if that’s a risk? And then on closures, when do you expect that we’ll be back to normal margins in the segment? And are you seeing any kind of uptake because of maybe a little bit stronger than expected barbecue season because of America 250? Are your customers talking about that or is that at this juncture? It’d be nice, but we’re not baking it in. Thanks, guys.
Stephan
All right, I haven’t heard the America 250, although it’s a worthy cause to celebrate, that’s for sure. So let’s all have some barbecues on that. Coming back on GLP1, I mean, demand is very strong. I still hear anecdotally that consumers have to wait not for weeks, but maybe a few days to get their prescription filled. You also Lilly’s very strong result with sepan, I think being up 80% or so. So clearly as people see other people losing weight, they want to get in on the fund and there is strong demand for the product. Gail, do you hear anything about pipeline build?
Gael Touya
Well, there’s a very healthy pipeline. I mean, as we speak, because obviously it’s attracting a lot of players.
Stephan
No, I mean inventory build. No, no, there’s no inventory. I mean, this is not at all what we are hearing from our customers. Yeah.
Vanessa Canu (Chief Financial Officer)
On closures. Let me start and maybe Vanessa also jump in. Clearly, let me not beat around the bush. Disappointed with some of the maintenance issues that we had and the two dozen tornado warnings that we got on our phones in the Midwest haven’t helped as we had to shut down plants and people take shelter adding up to 11 days. So my expectation would be for the second half foreclosure to return to normal margins. But I look to you, Vanessa. Absolutely, Stefan, you’re absolutely right. I don’t think I have much more to add to that.
George Staffos (Equity Analyst at Bank of America Securities)
We did have some challenges which I did call out in my prepared remarks and we do expect to see sequential margin improvements in closures and that’s baked into our guidance. Thank you, Vanessa. Thank you, Stephan. Thank you, Gail. I’ll turn it over.
OPERATOR
Your next line comes from Matt Roberts at Raymond James. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Matt Roberts
Vanessa and Mary, good morning Emergency. Going back to that the three point headwind in 1Q, is that on a dollar amount as well? Or maybe my Friday morning calculator is broken. So just a sanity check as it seems a bit lower. But then how did emergency growth Specifically compare in two Q25 to one Q25 and any other considerations within the pharma category that decelerated in 1Q worth mentioning? I noticed as the COPD wasn’t in the prepared remarks, but just seeing if anything else was going on there.
Stephan
Yeah, I think on your specific question I would ask you to follow up with Mary. I think it’s a very specific specific question that we probably don’t have at our fingertips. In general, let’s just reconfirm that the 65 million is still the right number, about 2/3 of the impact we expect in the first half of this year and the balance in the second half. So by the time Q4 comes around, this should be almost washed out. And certainly with Q1 27 we’ll have a clean comparison. So in the first half the bulk of the 65 million will have been done and we feel now reasonably confident that this is the new level. If you deduct the 65 million, this is the new level from which we expect to grow from kind of low to mid single digits according to our customers other movements. I don’t think we want to get into those specifics.
Matt Roberts
Great, I appreciate that Stefan. And while we’re on pharma, the margin down it was still within the range despite the mix impact I think down 1.1 and a half points versus the three points you saw last quarter that had narc and an emergency in there. So given what you saw in 4q and 1q, is the long term range still achievable in 26 or how do you think about the Progression through the year and in 1Q specifically, like I said, despite the mix was still within the range. So any other drivers of that, whether it was cost performance, was there any change in royalty revenues in the quarter or injectable margins have improved that much. Just any color there on what you’re seeing on the margin?
Stephan
Yeah, I mean pharma is a great business and of course emergency medicine is very profitable, hence somewhat lower margin, but still still within the range. So to answer your first question, yeah, we do expect pharma to be with it long term EBITDA margin target for the year and as the year progresses, you know, to return with the top line growth. I think we said also last time that we expect the company to be within its long term EBITDA margin target for the year, which is usually we don’t give guidance for the year, but that is obviously a consequence of pharma being there. So beyond that, when I say anything else.
Vanessa Canu (Chief Financial Officer)
Yeah, I think the only update I would add to that is as we
Matt Roberts
look at sort of full year and this really relates to, you know, the pass through of higher costs that we’re seeing. And I did mention this in my prepared remarks that as we pass on these costs, it does have a compression impact on margin percentage. But clearly our focus is to neutralize the dollar’s impact on our bottom line. And so you might see at the segment level of some compression based on the pass through of these costs. That makes sense. Thank you again.
OPERATOR
Your next question comes from the line of Matt LaRue at William Blair. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Matt LaRue (Equity Analyst at William Blair)
Good morning everyone. Maybe just following up on the margin point. You know, the six prior quarters before sort of the emergency med destock occurred, you know, corporate gross margins averaged around 38% and then obviously the last couple quarters below that because of the destock. You’ve also had, as you referenced, the operational issues in beauty enclosures. But all of those things as we get into the back half are improving. So just is it fair to think that you can get back to that range for gross corporate gross margins by Q3 or Q4?
Vanessa Canu (Chief Financial Officer)
Yeah, I mean, Matt, we’re guiding for Q2, we’re not guiding for Q3, Q4, but I think directionally that all aligns to what Stephane just shared and what we shared on the last call as well.
Matt LaRue (Equity Analyst at William Blair)
We do. And really it’s a gross margin story. The overall EBITDA margin impact is a gross margin story because you would have seen in Q1 we’re pretty tight from an SGA perspective and so no issues there. And so it’s really gross margins. Right. Which is coming from the mix impact, which is coming from the operational issues that we’ve had to deal. And beauty enclosures and all of those will start to sequentially improve starting in Q2. So directionally you’re absolutely right. Okay. And then maybe just following up on the kind of operational issues, the maintenance, which is something sort of you can control, and then the fire at one of your suppliers, which is something you can’t control as much. But just would be curious how those progressed in the quarter and I guess what your expectation is to when you’ll be closing the loop on those things.
Stephan
Yeah, I think we, I can only repeat what we said earlier. I certainly expected the second half for these issues, both in beauty and enclosures, to have passed with sequential improvements.
Matt LaRue (Equity Analyst at William Blair)
All right, thank you.
OPERATOR
Your next question comes from the line of Daniel Rizzo at Jefferies. Your line’s open. Please go ahead.
Daniel Rizzo (Equity Analyst at Jefferies)
Hey guys, thank you for taking my questions just on the Narcan. I was wondering if, you know, after we get through this initial kind of destock or this issue, if over the long term we’re going to see this again where emergency services or buyers of this product kind of reload, so to speak, and you see a huge surge and then it kind of flattened, then it declines. Is it going to be lumpy like that or is it just, I don’t know, just over ordering the first go round? How should we think about it?
Stephan
Yeah, hi, Dan. I certainly would expect the first one. I mean, this is such a unique set of circumstances where you have the originator more than a handful of generics over the counter approval and all this money from the settlements converging on this inhalation or everybody getting ready to do battle to win contracts. Now it’s a much more not organized, but it’s a competitive market. People win one state, lose another state. I don’t see the same kind of dynamics repeating. Now will you have lumpiness? I’m sure you know, there’s no business where you don’t have that. And this one has less visibility than most because we can’t track inventory levels at the end user. But since, you know, we have 50 states being in this game that there should be some evening out. And you have more than a dozen competitors. So this should even out. I don’t expect this kind of magnitude. I shouldn’t say ever again, but in the foreseeable future.
Daniel Rizzo (Equity Analyst at Jefferies)
Okay, no, that’s, that’s helpful and that’s kind of what I Assumed. But and then also so you mentioned that there was no pre buying for amongst your customers. I was wondering if you guys have, have stocked your own inventories or are planning to just to kind of, I don’t smooth things out and make sure that you, you have security of supply given the volatility with logistics, with input costs and with everything.
Vanessa Canu (Chief Financial Officer)
Yes Dan, absolutely. So our purchasing teams, our supply chain team teams are managing this very, very tightly, securing safety of supply, looking at, you know, obviously, you know, how do we balance geographically and monitoring even the health of some of our suppliers just to see what the impacts of rising energy costs may have on those suppliers overall health. And so we will actually increase some of our safety stocks. So I do expect that we’ll, we’ll see you know, a bit of a trend in rising inventory but for all of the right reasons and done intentionally to make sure that we’re well managed through the Middle east crisis and it’s
Daniel Rizzo (Equity Analyst at Jefferies)
its longer term impacts. Can you remind me, did you have to do that after Covid? Like the COVID logistical issues after Covid? Was this something similar kind of unfold? Not really that I can remember. Remember the main challenges in Covid were US labor availability. As we came out of COVID and people still had government money in their pockets and weren’t really coming back into manufacturing Europe companies kept running because the companies had the support from the government, not the individuals. So it returned pretty smoothly. So it’s very different. Thank you very much.
OPERATOR
A reminder, if you’d like to ask a question during this time, simply press star1 on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press Star one again. The next question comes from the line of Gabe Hady from Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.
Gabe Hady (Equity Analyst at Wells Fargo)
Stephan Gile, Mary Vanessa, good morning. I wanted to ask about active this quarter. I know you guys talked about probiotics and I think another headwind for test strips on a go forward basis. I know we’re talking a lot about GLP1s for injectables, but I think there’s some solutions that you all have for oral solid dose of GLP1. Anything that you can highlight in that arena for us?
Stephan
Yeah, I certainly would not put too much into to active film, which is kind of the film that goes into the blisters of let’s say sensitive drugs in the GLP1 drugs. I think it’s too early. I know we have one in the pipeline here, but it’s too early to kind of make any calculations on that. I think the active material business has very exciting pipeline, for example on nitrosamine reduction. That is a much bigger topic that the FDA is cracking down on and where maybe the only solution where you can reduce neutrosamine and not change anything else. I think the other dynamic that played out this quarter is that the further transition from, you know, the finger prick with diabetes test strips, where we make the vial for the test strips, to more flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring. As you know we are involved with Abbott’s libre and lingo so it’s more
Gabe Hady (Equity Analyst at Wells Fargo)
of a matter, you know, the decline of the first one or the growth of the second one, how this balances out in any given quarter. But overall we continue to be bullish about active material. But I wouldn’t hang it on oral GLP1. Understood. Vanessa, I don’t think you called out a specific headwind and I generally speaking historically you all have been able to catch up pretty quick on price cost headwinds. But is there something specifically baked into Q2 on resin lags or anything else on transports etc. That you’re behind on that you would expect to get back in the second half?
Vanessa Canu (Chief Financial Officer)
Not, not anything material to call out? Gabe, this is something that. So yes. So I’ll go back and just start with yes, of course we are going to see the impacts of rising resin prices. We’ve already been feeling that in our business, our closures business is actually where we see the biggest impact from a segment perspective. But of course it does impact all segments closures. We are generally protected by indexation and beauty and pharma a little bit less so but even there we pass it on to customers. We’ve done that, you know, in other periods of rising costs, you know, so this is something that we have a good muscle for. And then in terms of, you know, impacts to Q2, we’ve already started, you know, with those cost pass throughs and you know, we don’t expect any net material impacts to our overall Q2 results and that’s already baked into our guidance.
Gabe Hady (Equity Analyst at Wells Fargo)
Okay, perfect. And I guess that’s good to see. The last one was you did mention an answer to a prior question about maybe yourselves building a little bit of safety stock. Is that on the raw material side? Finished. Good side. And I’m just thinking about overhead absorption to the extent that things de escalate here and we’re, I don’t know, nine months from now that you may be under producing in some product lines. So just curious if there’s anything, anything specific I think Stefan, that you may have Mentioned where you’re, you’re like I said, building up a little bit of safety net.
Vanessa Canu (Chief Financial Officer)
Yeah, no, that’s on the raw material side and you know, just to make sure that, you know, we don’t run out of any critical inputs.
Gabe Hady (Equity Analyst at Wells Fargo)
Okay, thank you.
Stephan
Thanks Dave.
OPERATOR
Your next question comes from George Staffos at the bank of America securities. You, your line is open. Please go ahead.
George Staffos (Equity Analyst at Bank of America Securities)
Hi. Thanks everyone. Just a couple of quick ones. First of all, Vanessa, if you mentioned it, I’d missed it. Can you talk about what the minority investment write off was, you know, what the amount was and what was behind it. And then you know, with the discussion on closures and obviously you’re managing through operating issues and you’ll resolve them in the second half. Remind us how the Lincolnton plant’s been doing. You know, I know that goes back over 10 years, but how has that performed after you put it up for food and beverage and in general, how do you view your operating network in closures now and how’s Lincolnton doing in particular? Thank you and good luck in the quarter.
Stephan
Let me start with Lincoln and Vanessa, maybe you can address the other question. Lincoln is doing fine. Like any other plant, it has sometimes an issue here and there, but overall it has grown up to be a good performing plant. It had also some of the weather issues that we talked about. It wasn’t just in the Midwest, also in the South, I think we had
Vanessa Canu (Chief Financial Officer)
some snow there, but other than that, actually quite happy with Lincoln. The maintenance issues we talked about actually more in the Wisconsin plant. And then Vanessa, maybe you talk about the venturing. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. And George, I didn’t talk too much about it in my remarks.
George Staffos (Equity Analyst at Bank of America Securities)
I did just, I just, I commented that there was, you know, additionally a write off of a minority investment. It was not the most material item. You know, Stefan just mentioned the maintenance challenges, the weather issues. And this was yet another factor that impacted closures unfortunately you know, negatively in the quarter. It was not a big amount. It was a minority investment. It was a venture investment that we made a few years ago. And as we do with all investments, we assess, you know, the recoverability of the investment and we chose to provide against it. So it probably had about, you know, again, it was not the most material impact but another thing that impacted closures margins in the quarter, but not material to aptar overall. I mean overall few million bucks, 100,000. Any way to size it bigger than
Vanessa Canu (Chief Financial Officer)
about, about 50 or 60 basis points in margin impact year over year? Okay, so important to call out, but I wouldn’t spend too too much time on it.
George Staffos (Equity Analyst at Bank of America Securities)
Yeah, I mean overall I actually not to digress too much, you know we have a venture in program that has served us very well to you know complement our in house innovation by taking positions in leading edge companies that do innovation and you know we trade a few million investments often against the board seed and and get some dips on the technology and overall the portfolio has been returning quite well. But as venturing goes you don’t win them all and those that you don’t win you have to write off. Thank you guys. Appreciate it.
OPERATOR
Thanks George.
Stephan
There are no further questions at this time. Mr. Tander, I turn the call back over to you. Great, thanks. Let me zoom out and summarize the call. Number one, thanks for holding off on the roasting. Appreciate it. On the quarter the team performed solidly, overcoming some of the unexpected challenges and delivering a good EPS number. As we move through the last two quarters, the visibility of the destocking trajectory of emergency medicine has improved and we have confirmed our estimate of the 65 million and that about two thirds of that will impact the first half of this year with the balance of the second half. We talked about that Q1 was a tough comp for prescription in particular, but we expect prescription excluding emergency medicine to return to solid growth in quarter two, adding to the growth of injectables and consumer healthcare. We didn’t talk about it much, but we continue to be very excited about the growing pipeline in pharma on the back of ever growing numbers of systemic nasal drug delivery projects and higher participation in injectable projects including EGLP1s biologics and Annex 1 driven projects. As a reminder, pulmonary biologics and systemic nasal drug delivery remain the top end markets in our pharma pipeline on a risk adjusted basis. And as I mentioned in my remarks, more and more of our customers choose to disclose their collaboration with Aptar, also a credibility builder for them in their early development phases, which allows us then to give you progressively more color on the kinds of things that are in the pipeline. As we look to Q2 and the balance of 26 emergency medicine aside, we are well positioned for broad based growth across all three of our segments. Continued strong growth in pharma of course including em with solid momentum across injectables, systemic nasal drug delivery, consumer healthcare beauty has returned to growth and enclosures. We expect continued innovation driving more category conversions including in personal care applications. We are executing on our rigorous productivity roadmap not only to address the short term headwinds including now the impacts from the Middle east conflict, but also to drive further efficiencies across our operations and supply chain networks as well as sga. Last not least, our strong balance sheets gives us strong optionality while investing in the business and returning capital to shareholders. And with that, we look forward to talk to you in the coming weeks.
Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company’s SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants’ and analysts’ statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice.
Recent Comments